My rating: 2.5 of 5 stars
Publication Date: March 24th 2015
Publisher: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers
Point of View: 3rd Person & Alternative
Recommended Age: 13+
Genres & Themes: Young Adult, Contemporary, Romance
Before the asteroid we let ourselves be defined by labels:
The athlete, the outcast, the slacker, the overachiever.
But then we all looked up and everything changed.
They said it would be here in two months. That gave us two months to leave our labels behind. Two months to become something bigger than what we’d been, something that would last even after the end.
Two months to really live.
2.5 stars, maybe? Another case of ‘‘great concept, poor execution.’’ And was it really necessary to have two guys chasing after the same girl? I didn’t see what was so special about Eliza. Yes, she was super pretty and super talented… but rather self-centered by moment. I love caring and considerate characters, two qualities she scantily showed.
Excuse me while I shudder with horror at how widespread love-triangles are in the book world.
Two months before an asteroid decimates your world. What do you do? Do you …
1) Sit and pray that the 33.33 of chance it doesn’t wins on the 66.66 that it does
2) Keep on with your life; an asteroid won’t thwart you from getting your high school diploma!
3) LIVE: do whatever you wanted to but never had the courage to, say whatever is in your heart that you were afraid to, follow your dreams, make dreams, LIVE
Eliza, Anita, Andy and Peter all chose the 3rd option. Eliza creates a blog, Anita runs away from her home, Andy starts his chase of a dream (or, shall I say, ‘‘girl’’) and Peter decides to stop lying to himself and to, instead, pursuit his own happiness.
Labels indeed, a lot of them. And, by reading the synopsis, I truly thought that the whole asteroid-is-going-to-crush-our-country thing was to change all of that. False. Maybe the labels become less defined but they’re still there, especially regarding Eliza’s character. Countless times had characters called and thought of her as a ‘‘slut.’’ Maybe she stopped her night activities but people still remembered her as a marie-couche-toi-là, meaning extremely easy. But that was, of course, false too.
I’m being very negative right now… it wasn’t an execrable story, hence my not giving it a one-star rating. The characterization won’t get any praising from me, but I must admit that the story itself did make me ask myself a couple of spiritual and fundamental questions. This alone, for some people, would be enough to give this book a five-star rating.
Because not any book can provoke our minds.